Can I use jpackage to build application images for native applications created with Graals native-image?

2 min read 04-10-2024
Can I use jpackage to build application images for native applications created with Graals native-image?


jpackage and GraalVM Native Image: A Match Made in Heaven?

Building native applications with GraalVM's native-image is becoming increasingly popular, offering significant performance gains and reduced resource consumption. However, packaging these applications for distribution can be a challenge. Can jpackage, Java's built-in packaging tool, be used for this purpose?

The Scenario

Let's imagine you've created a Java application using GraalVM native-image, and now you want to distribute it as a self-contained executable for different operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux). The natural inclination is to reach for jpackage, which provides a straightforward way to package Java applications.

jpackage --name MyApplication --input MyApplication.jar --type exe --output MyApplication

While this might work with traditional Java applications compiled to bytecode, it won't work with native images generated by GraalVM.

Understanding the Problem

The core issue lies in how jpackage works. It relies on the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) to execute the application. Native images, however, are compiled directly to machine code, bypassing the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) entirely. This means jpackage won't be able to find the necessary components to execute the native image.

The Solution: Embrace the Native

To successfully package a GraalVM native image application, you need to embrace its native nature. jpackage isn't the right tool for the job. Instead, consider these alternative strategies:

  • Platform-Specific Packaging: Utilize platform-specific tools for packaging your application. This might involve using tools like:
    • macOS: pkgbuild and productbuild
    • Windows: Inno Setup or WiX
    • Linux: deb and rpm packages
  • Containerization: Pack your application in a container using Docker or Podman. This approach ensures a self-contained environment with all necessary dependencies.
  • Custom Scripting: If a more flexible approach is desired, create a custom script that handles the installation and setup process.

Example: Packaging a Native Image Application for Linux

Let's assume you've created a native image application named myapp in a Linux environment. You can create a simple deb package using a tool like dpkg-deb or fpm:

fpm -s dir -t deb -n myapp -v 1.0.0 -C /path/to/myapp -p myapp_1.0.0_amd64.deb

This command packages the myapp directory into a Debian package (myapp_1.0.0_amd64.deb) ready for distribution.

Conclusion

While jpackage might be a convenient tool for packaging traditional Java applications, it's not the right choice for GraalVM native image applications. These applications require different packaging strategies that leverage their native nature. Embrace platform-specific packaging tools, containerization, or custom scripting to successfully distribute your native image applications.