Can AutoFDO and Bolt Optimized Binaries Be Iteratively Optimized?
Optimizing binary code for performance is a complex task. Tools like AutoFDO (Automatic Profile-Guided Optimization) and Bolt, a binary rewriting tool, can significantly improve performance by leveraging profiling data and applying specialized optimizations. But can these optimizations be applied iteratively to further enhance the binary's performance?
The Scenario:
Imagine you have a computationally intensive application compiled with a standard optimization level (-O2 or -O3). You run AutoFDO, which uses profiling data to generate a more optimized version of the binary. You then apply Bolt to further enhance performance.
Original Code:
# Compile with standard optimization
g++ -O2 my_application.cpp -o my_application
# Run AutoFDO
autofdo my_application --input-profile my_application.prof
# Apply Bolt
bolt my_application -o my_application_optimized
The Question:
Can you repeatedly run AutoFDO and Bolt on the my_application_optimized binary to achieve even better performance?
The Answer: It's not as straightforward as it seems.
Analysis:
- AutoFDO: AutoFDO relies on profiling data to guide optimizations. Applying it iteratively may not yield significant gains as the initial optimization process has already incorporated the available profiling data.
- Bolt: Bolt makes targeted changes to the binary based on its internal analysis. Repeatedly running it might result in diminishing returns as the optimization space shrinks with each iteration.
- Interplay: The interplay between AutoFDO and Bolt adds another layer of complexity. Bolt's optimizations could affect the profile used by AutoFDO in subsequent iterations, leading to potential conflicts or suboptimal outcomes.
Additional Considerations:
- Code Structure: The effectiveness of iterative optimizations depends heavily on the code structure and its optimization potential.
- Optimization Levels: Running AutoFDO and Bolt with higher optimization levels in subsequent iterations might be beneficial but could also lead to increased compilation times and potential code instability.
- Data Dependency: The effectiveness of each tool is influenced by the type and quality of the profiling data used.
Alternative Approaches:
Instead of iterative optimization, consider these alternative approaches for further enhancing performance:
- Manual Optimization: Identify performance bottlenecks through profiling and manually optimize critical code sections.
- Code Rewriting: Implement performance-enhancing algorithms or data structures to fundamentally improve the application's efficiency.
- Platform-Specific Optimizations: Utilize platform-specific libraries and optimizations tailored to your hardware.
Conclusion:
While iterative application of AutoFDO and Bolt might seem intuitive, it's not a guaranteed path to further performance improvements. The effectiveness of such an approach depends on factors like code structure, optimization levels, and the interplay between the tools. It's important to understand the limitations and explore alternative approaches to achieve significant performance gains.
Remember: Optimizing binaries is an iterative process, and understanding the nuances of each optimization technique and its impact on the code is crucial.
Resources:
