Unraveling the Mystery: Converting SVG Fill Rules "evenodd" to "nonzero"
SVG fill rules, "evenodd" and "nonzero," determine how the interior of a path is filled when it contains self-intersections. While both rules seem straightforward, understanding their nuanced differences and the process of converting between them can be a bit of a puzzle. This article will demystify this conversion process, providing a clear understanding of the concepts and practical methods for achieving it.
The Problem: Filling Paths with Self-Intersections
Let's visualize the problem with a simple example. Imagine a shape like a star with overlapping points. When you apply a fill to this shape, the question arises: how do we decide which areas are considered "inside" the star and should be filled?
Here's where the fill rules come in. The "evenodd" rule follows a simple principle: if a ray originating from a point inside the shape intersects an odd number of path segments, the point is considered inside and gets filled. Conversely, if the ray intersects an even number of segments, the point is considered outside.
On the other hand, the "nonzero" rule, also known as the "winding number" rule, is a bit more complex. It calculates the winding number of a point around each path segment. If the winding number is non-zero, the point is inside and gets filled.
Illustrative Example:
<svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="0 0 200 200">
<path d="M100,10 L100,90 L50,90 L70,50 L130,50 L150,90 L100,90 Z"
fill="red" fill-rule="evenodd" />
</svg>
In this example, with "evenodd" fill rule, the center of the star is considered inside the shape because a ray from the center intersects an odd number of path segments. But, if we change "evenodd" to "nonzero," the center might be considered outside depending on the winding number calculation.
Converting "evenodd" to "nonzero"
Directly converting "evenodd" to "nonzero" is not possible without modifying the path data. The "evenodd" rule essentially simplifies the filling process compared to "nonzero." However, we can achieve a similar visual effect by carefully manipulating the path data to mimic the behavior of "evenodd."
Here's a basic approach:
- Identify overlapping areas: Analyze the path data to identify areas where paths self-intersect.
- Break down complex paths: Separate the complex path into simpler paths that don't self-intersect.
- Adjust path order: Arrange the individual paths in a way that ensures the desired fill behavior is achieved.
Note: This process can be tedious and requires careful understanding of the path data structure. Tools like SVG editors can greatly simplify the process by visually highlighting overlapping areas.
Practical Considerations
- Visual Effects: While "evenodd" and "nonzero" offer similar visual outcomes in many cases, they can result in different filling behaviors in intricate shapes.
- Performance: "Evenodd" is generally faster to process due to its simplicity, whereas "nonzero" calculations can be more computationally demanding.
- Flexibility: The "nonzero" rule offers greater flexibility in handling complex path combinations, but it comes at the cost of complexity in defining the paths.
Conclusion
Converting "evenodd" to "nonzero" requires a thorough understanding of path data and a willingness to adjust the path structure. While it's not a straightforward conversion, manipulating the path data can help achieve similar visual effects. For simpler shapes, "evenodd" might be sufficient, while complex shapes might benefit from the flexibility of "nonzero." Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific requirements of your design and the trade-offs you are willing to make.
Resources:
