Updating Chrono::timestamp for Rolling Elapse Times: A Deep Dive
This article explores the common challenge of updating Chrono::timestamp
values within a class for tracking rolling elapsed times. We'll analyze the provided example code, understand the error, and provide solutions with additional insights.
The Problem: Modifying a const
Member
The core issue arises from trying to modify m_timestamp
within a const
member function. The error message "passing 'const std::chrono::_V2::system_clock::time_point' ... as 'this' argument discards qualifiers" highlights this conflict.
The code snippet provided, with the const
qualifier on the trackTime
function, prevents modification of member variables within the function's scope.
Example Code Breakdown:
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <cstdint>
namespace chrono = std::chrono;
namespace chrono_lit = std::chrono_literals;
using namespace chrono_lit;
class TrackTimeElapsed {
public:
TrackTimeElapsed(uint64_t interval) :
m_timestamp(chrono::steady_clock::now()), m_interval(interval) {}
~TrackTimeElapsed() {}
void trackTime() const { // This line causes the error
chrono::time_point<chrono::steady_clock> now = chrono::steady_clock::now();
auto diff = chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::seconds>(now - m_timestamp);
if (diff.count() > m_interval) {
std::cout << "Time elapsed" << std::endl;
// Update timestamp to help track when next print out needs to occur.
m_timestamp = now; // Error occurs here
}
}
private:
chrono::time_point<chrono::steady_clock> m_timestamp;
uint64_t m_interval;
};
Solutions and Considerations
Here are two approaches to address this issue:
-
Remove
const
Qualifier:The simplest solution is to remove the
const
qualifier from thetrackTime
function. This allows the function to modify them_timestamp
member.void trackTime() { // Remove the `const` qualifier chrono::time_point<chrono::steady_clock> now = chrono::steady_clock::now(); // ... rest of the code m_timestamp = now; }
Important Note: This approach might be suitable if the
trackTime
function truly needs to update them_timestamp
. However, if the goal is to maintain theconst
nature of the function for encapsulation or design reasons, alternative solutions are recommended. -
Utilize a Mutable Member:
This solution allows the function to be
const
while still enabling modification of them_timestamp
member. We can use themutable
keyword for them_timestamp
member.class TrackTimeElapsed { // ... other code ... private: mutable chrono::time_point<chrono::steady_clock> m_timestamp; uint64_t m_interval; };
Explanation:
- The
mutable
keyword allows a member to be modified even within aconst
member function. This means that thetrackTime
function can update them_timestamp
member even though the function itself is markedconst
. - This approach helps maintain the
const
nature of the function, ensuring that the class's internal state is not modified by accident.
- The
Practical Considerations and Improvements
- Precision and Accuracy: While using
std::chrono
for time tracking is excellent, consider the precision needed for your application. If high precision is critical, you might need to explore other libraries or techniques for precise time measurements. - Performance: The frequency of updating
m_timestamp
can impact performance. If performance is a concern, optimize the update logic. - Error Handling: Consider incorporating robust error handling mechanisms to handle unexpected time-related scenarios, such as time jumps or time drift.
Further Learning
- Chrono Documentation: Dive deeper into
std::chrono
for a comprehensive understanding: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono - Stack Overflow: Utilize Stack Overflow for additional insights and solutions from experienced developers: https://stackoverflow.com/
Remember: The choice of approach depends on your application's specific requirements. Carefully analyze your needs and select the best solution for accurate, reliable, and efficient time tracking.