Bridging the Gap: pytest-bdd and pytest-asyncio
Problem: Trying to use pytest-bdd features (like scenario outlines and data tables) in tests that require asynchronous operations using pytest-asyncio results in unexpected errors.
Simplified: You want to write BDD tests that interact with asynchronous code, but it doesn't work as smoothly as expected.
Scenario: You've written a test using pytest-bdd's @scenario
decorator and are trying to integrate it with asynchronous code using pytest-asyncio
's @pytest.mark.asyncio
decorator. However, you encounter errors related to either the scenario steps not being executed correctly or the asynchronous operations not working as intended.
Original Code (Example):
import pytest
from pytest_bdd import scenarios, scenario, given, when, then
@pytest.mark.asyncio
@scenarios('features/my_feature.feature')
def test_my_feature(request):
scenario = request.param
request.param.name = scenario.name
request.param.steps = scenario.steps
request.param.steps[0].run()
# ... rest of the steps
Analysis:
The issue arises from the conflicting nature of the two libraries. pytest-bdd
expects the steps to be executed synchronously, while pytest-asyncio
aims to manage asynchronous operations.
Here are some key reasons why you might be encountering problems:
- Step Execution Order:
pytest-bdd
expects steps to be executed in order, whereaspytest-asyncio
's asynchronous nature might lead to unexpected step execution order. - Step Function Signature:
pytest-bdd
might not recognize the signature of a coroutine function, which is essential forpytest-asyncio
. - Fixture Scopes: Asynchronous fixtures need to be defined with specific scopes (
session
,module
,class
,function
) to work correctly withpytest-asyncio
and might clash with the default scopes of fixtures inpytest-bdd
.
Solutions:
- Embrace the
@pytest.mark.asyncio
decorator: Use@pytest.mark.asyncio
on the step functions instead of the scenario itself to ensure that each step is executed asynchronously.
@given("...")
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def given_step(context):
# Asynchronous code
- Utilize Asynchronous Fixtures: Define fixtures with the
@pytest.mark.asyncio
decorator to create resources that are compatible with asynchronous code.
@pytest.fixture
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def async_resource():
# Asynchronous resource setup
return resource
- Explicitly Run Async Steps: You can use
asyncio.run
to explicitly run asynchronous steps within the context of the scenario.
@scenario(...)
def test_my_feature(request):
scenario = request.param
request.param.name = scenario.name
request.param.steps = scenario.steps
asyncio.run(request.param.steps[0].run())
# ... rest of the steps
Example:
import pytest
from pytest_bdd import scenarios, scenario, given, when, then
import asyncio
@pytest.mark.asyncio
@scenarios('features/my_feature.feature')
def test_my_feature(request):
scenario = request.param
request.param.name = scenario.name
request.param.steps = scenario.steps
async def run_step(step):
await step.run()
for step in request.param.steps:
asyncio.run(run_step(step))
Additional Considerations:
- Scope: Carefully consider the scope of your fixtures to ensure they are available and managed correctly within the context of your scenario.
- Context: Ensure your BDD steps properly interact with the asynchronous context to avoid errors.
- Debugging: Use
asyncio.debug
to gain insights into the execution of your asynchronous code.
Conclusion:
Bridging the gap between pytest-bdd
and pytest-asyncio
requires a thoughtful approach. By understanding the challenges and implementing appropriate solutions, you can successfully utilize the power of BDD for testing your asynchronous applications.
References: