Jasmine: Matcher to be different from undefined and diferent from null (!= undefined and != null)

2 min read 06-10-2024
Jasmine: Matcher to be different from undefined and diferent from null (!= undefined and != null)


Jasmine: Asserting Values That Aren't Null or Undefined

Testing your JavaScript code is crucial for building robust and reliable applications. Jasmine, a popular testing framework, offers a wide range of matchers to express your assertions effectively. One common scenario is to verify that a value is neither null nor undefined. While Jasmine provides the toBeNull and toBeUndefined matchers, it lacks a dedicated matcher for the "not null and not undefined" case.

Let's illustrate this through a simple example. Imagine you have a function that retrieves data from an API and returns it. You want to ensure that this function doesn't return either null or undefined.

function fetchData() {
  // Simulate API call with possible null or undefined response
  return Math.random() < 0.5 ? 'someData' : null;
}

describe('fetchData', () => {
  it('should return a valid value', () => {
    const data = fetchData();
    // How to assert that data is neither null nor undefined?
  });
});

Combining Jasmine Matchers for a Solution

While Jasmine lacks a specific matcher for this scenario, we can leverage existing matchers to achieve the desired outcome. There are two primary approaches:

  1. Negating toBeNull and toBeUndefined: We can combine the not operator with toBeNull and toBeUndefined matchers. This approach explicitly checks that the value is not null and not undefined.

    expect(data).not.toBeNull();
    expect(data).not.toBeUndefined();
    
  2. Using the toBeDefined matcher: This matcher directly asserts that the value is defined, effectively covering both null and undefined cases.

    expect(data).toBeDefined();
    

Both methods achieve the same result, verifying that the data variable holds a value other than null or undefined. The choice between them depends on your preference and the clarity you desire in your test code.

Choosing the Best Approach

While both approaches work, using toBeDefined offers a more concise and readable solution, especially when dealing with more complex assertions. It clearly conveys the intention of verifying that a value is defined.

Here's a revised example with toBeDefined:

describe('fetchData', () => {
  it('should return a valid value', () => {
    const data = fetchData();
    expect(data).toBeDefined();
  });
});

By understanding how to combine Jasmine matchers effectively, you can express complex assertions with clarity and maintain the readability of your test code.

Conclusion

While Jasmine doesn't offer a specific matcher for "not null and not undefined," combining existing matchers like toBeDefined or negating toBeNull and toBeUndefined provides a robust and easy-to-understand way to assert the existence of a valid value. Remember to prioritize clarity and readability in your test code to improve maintainability and collaboration.