Debugging TypeScript Circular References: A Case Study with Prisma and Jest-Mock-Extended
Testing your Prisma models with Jest can be a powerful way to ensure your application's data access layer works correctly. However, when using libraries like jest-mock-extended to create deep mocks of your Prisma client, you might encounter the dreaded "Circular Reference" error. This error can be frustrating to debug, especially when TypeScript's strict type checking is involved.
Let's break down this common scenario, understand its root cause, and explore how to resolve it effectively.
The Problem: Circular References in Jest Mocks
Imagine you have a simple Prisma model for a User with a profile property. In your tests, you want to mock a User instance with a nested profile object, which itself references the User instance. This creates a circular dependency:
// User.ts
import { PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client';
const prisma = new PrismaClient();
export interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
profile: Profile;
}
export interface Profile {
id: string;
bio: string;
user: User; // Circular Reference!
}
// User.test.ts
import { User, Profile } from './User';
import { mocked } from 'jest-mock-extended';
describe('User', () => {
it('should create a new user', () => {
const userMock = mocked<User>({
id: 'test-user-id',
name: 'Test User',
profile: mocked<Profile>({
id: 'test-profile-id',
bio: 'Test bio',
user: userMock // Circular reference!
})
});
// ... your test logic
});
});
This code will cause the TypeScript compiler to throw a "Circular Reference" error. While this example is simplified, the same issue can arise in more complex scenarios with deeply nested objects and relationships.
Why Does This Happen?
TypeScript strictly enforces type safety, which means that every variable or object must have a well-defined type. In the case of circular references, TypeScript struggles to resolve the types of the involved entities because they depend on each other. This leads to the "Circular Reference" error.
Resolving the Circular Reference Issue
The solution is to break the circular dependency by introducing an intermediary object or using type assertion:
1. Using an Intermediary Object:
Instead of directly referencing userMock within profileMock, create a temporary object to hold the user property:
it('should create a new user', () => {
const userMock = mocked<User>({
id: 'test-user-id',
name: 'Test User',
profile: mocked<Profile>({
id: 'test-profile-id',
bio: 'Test bio',
user: { } // Temporary object
})
});
// Populate the user property after creating the profileMock
userMock.profile.user = userMock;
// ... your test logic
});
This approach allows TypeScript to infer the type of user correctly, preventing the circular reference error.
2. Using Type Assertion:
You can directly type assert the userMock object:
it('should create a new user', () => {
const userMock = mocked<User>({
id: 'test-user-id',
name: 'Test User',
profile: mocked<Profile>({
id: 'test-profile-id',
bio: 'Test bio',
user: userMock as User // Type assertion
})
});
// ... your test logic
});
This method explicitly tells TypeScript to treat userMock as a User object, bypassing the type checking issue.
Best Practices for Avoiding Circular References
- Prioritize Clarity: Avoid excessive nesting or complex data structures that can easily introduce circular references.
- Use Separate Objects: Whenever possible, use distinct objects instead of directly referencing the parent object within a nested property.
- Utilize Type Assertions Carefully: While type assertions can be useful, overuse can lead to type safety issues. Use them judiciously and only when necessary.
Conclusion
Circular references can be a common source of frustration in TypeScript development. By understanding the underlying cause and implementing the strategies described above, you can confidently mock your Prisma models and write robust unit tests with Jest. Remember to always prioritize code clarity and maintain a balance between flexibility and type safety.
Additional Resources:
