Extending Jest Expectations with TypeScript: A File-Scoped Approach
Jest's expect.extend() functionality allows you to customize expectations, making your tests more readable and expressive. However, extending Jest globally can lead to namespace conflicts or unnecessary bloat. This article explores a practical approach to extending Jest's expectations using TypeScript, scoped to a single test file.
The Challenge
Imagine you're testing a function that validates a user's email address. You want to write a specific expectation to check if the email format is valid. You could write a custom function and use expect assertions, but this approach can become verbose and repetitive.
Here's a simple example:
// emailValidator.ts
function validateEmail(email: string): boolean {
// ... email validation logic ...
}
// emailValidator.test.ts
import { validateEmail } from './emailValidator';
describe('validateEmail', () => {
it('should return true for valid email formats', () => {
const email = '[email protected]';
expect(validateEmail(email)).toBe(true);
});
it('should return false for invalid email formats', () => {
const email = 'invalid-format';
expect(validateEmail(email)).toBe(false);
});
});
The Solution: File-Scoped Jest Extensions
By leveraging TypeScript's module scope, we can define our custom expectations within a single test file. This approach ensures a clean and focused testing environment.
Let's introduce our custom expectation, toBeValidEmail, within our test file:
// emailValidator.test.ts
import { validateEmail } from './emailValidator';
// Extend Jest with a custom expectation
expect.extend({
toBeValidEmail(received: string) {
if (validateEmail(received)) {
return {
message: () => `expected ${received} not to be a valid email address`,
pass: true,
};
} else {
return {
message: () => `expected ${received} to be a valid email address`,
pass: false,
};
}
},
});
describe('validateEmail', () => {
it('should return true for valid email formats', () => {
const email = '[email protected]';
expect(email).toBeValidEmail();
});
it('should return false for invalid email formats', () => {
const email = 'invalid-format';
expect(email).not.toBeValidEmail();
});
});
Breaking it Down
- Extend Jest: We use
expect.extend({ ... })to introduce our custom expectation. - Custom Expectation Function: We define a function named
toBeValidEmail. It takes the received value (received) and performs the necessary validation usingvalidateEmail. - Pass/Fail Logic: The function returns an object with
pass(boolean) indicating whether the expectation passed or failed, andmessage(function) to provide a descriptive message when the expectation fails. - Using the Custom Expectation: In our tests, we can now use the
toBeValidEmail()matcher in ourexpectstatements.
Benefits of a File-Scoped Approach
- Clean Code: Keeps custom expectations isolated within the specific test file, improving readability and maintainability.
- Namespace Control: Avoids potential conflicts with other custom expectations or Jest's built-in matchers.
- Focused Testing: Ensures that your tests are clear and focused on the specific logic being tested.
Conclusion
Extending Jest expectations within a single test file provides a practical and efficient way to customize your tests in TypeScript. This approach offers a balance between code clarity, maintainability, and specific testing needs. Remember, well-crafted custom expectations can significantly enhance your test suite's readability and expressiveness.
Resources:
