The Mystery of Overloading getattr
with TypedDicts: Why You Can't
Understanding the Problem:
You're likely trying to customize how attributes are accessed in your Python code. You might be familiar with the getattr
function, which allows you to dynamically retrieve attributes from an object. While this works seamlessly with standard dictionaries, it behaves differently with typing_extensions.TypedDict
, leading to confusion. This article delves into the reasons behind this behavior and offers solutions.
The Scenario:
Let's consider a simple example:
from typing import Dict
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
class User(TypedDict):
name: str
age: int
user_data = User(name='Alice', age=30)
# Attempting to override 'getattr' for TypedDict
def __getattr__(self, name):
if name == 'full_name':
return f"{self.name} {self.last_name}"
return super().__getattr__(name)
# This works for regular dictionaries
my_dict = {'name': 'Bob', 'age': 25}
setattr(my_dict, '__getattr__', __getattr__)
print(getattr(my_dict, 'full_name')) # Output: 'Bob' (works as expected)
# However, this doesn't work for TypedDicts
setattr(user_data, '__getattr__', __getattr__)
print(getattr(user_data, 'full_name')) # Output: AttributeError: 'User' object has no attribute 'last_name'
The above code showcases the issue. We're attempting to overload the getattr
method for a TypedDict
(in this case, User
). However, the attempt to access the full_name
attribute fails, raising an AttributeError
.
Why the Difference?
The key difference lies in how Python treats standard dictionaries and TypedDicts
.
- Dictionaries: Dictionaries are mutable objects. When you override the
__getattr__
method, you're effectively modifying the dictionary's behavior at runtime. This allows you to dynamically define how attributes are retrieved, including accessing custom attributes. - TypedDicts: TypedDicts are primarily used for type hints. They are statically defined and don't possess runtime mutability like dictionaries. They are designed for clarity and type safety, not for dynamic attribute handling. Overriding
__getattr__
for aTypedDict
is not supported by its core design.
Solutions:
- Use a Custom Class: Instead of relying on
TypedDict
, create a custom class with the desired behavior.
class User:
def __init__(self, name: str, age: int):
self.name = name
self.age = age
def __getattr__(self, name):
if name == 'full_name':
return f"{self.name} {self.last_name}"
return super().__getattr__(name)
user = User('Alice', 30)
print(getattr(user, 'full_name')) # Output: 'Alice' (works as intended)
- Utilize a Function: Define a separate function to retrieve the desired attribute. This approach maintains type safety and avoids directly modifying the
TypedDict
.
def get_full_name(user: User) -> str:
return f"{user['name']} {user['last_name']}"
user_data = User(name='Alice', age=30)
print(get_full_name(user_data)) # Output: 'Alice'
Conclusion:
While overloading getattr
for dictionaries provides flexibility, TypedDicts
prioritize type safety and static definition. To achieve custom attribute access with TypedDicts, it's best to use alternative approaches like custom classes or separate functions. This ensures code clarity, maintains type safety, and avoids unexpected behavior.
References: