Why do std::flat_set and std::flat_map have overloaded constructors for std::initializer_list?
C++ provides a powerful mechanism for initializing containers using std::initializer_list. While this feature is widely used, it's interesting to note that only std::flat_set and std::flat_map, from the std::experimental namespace, have overloaded constructors accepting std::initializer_list. This raises the question: why?
Let's explore the reasoning behind this design decision and understand its implications.
Understanding the Scenario
The std::flat_set and std::flat_map are container adapters built on top of a contiguous array, offering the advantages of sets and maps with optimized performance for random access and insertion/deletion. These containers are particularly useful when dealing with scenarios where maintaining order is critical, but you also require fast access to elements.
The std::initializer_list allows you to initialize containers with a compact and elegant syntax, like this:
std::flat_set<int> mySet {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
This code initializes a std::flat_set with values 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Why the Difference?
The reason behind the exclusive inclusion of std::initializer_list constructors in std::flat_set and std::flat_map lies in the nature of their underlying implementation and the common use cases.
-
Contiguous Memory: Both
std::flat_setandstd::flat_maputilize a flat, contiguous array for storing their elements. This allows for direct access to individual elements and efficient insertion/deletion operations. Thestd::initializer_listprovides a convenient way to populate this array during initialization. -
Sorted Order: As set and map containers,
std::flat_setandstd::flat_mapmaintain elements in a sorted order. Thestd::initializer_listconstructor can leverage this ordering during initialization, efficiently placing elements in the correct positions within the underlying array. -
Simplicity and Efficiency: Using an
std::initializer_listconstructor simplifies the process of initializing these containers, reducing the need for manual iteration and insertion operations. Additionally, it enables more efficient initialization, especially when compared to the alternative of manually adding elements using theinsert()method.
Implications for Other Container Adapters
Other container adapters like std::set, std::map, std::unordered_set, and std::unordered_map are based on different underlying structures (e.g., balanced binary trees or hash tables). These structures have different properties and initialization requirements. For instance, initializing a balanced binary tree from an std::initializer_list might not be as straightforward or efficient.
Therefore, providing std::initializer_list constructors for these other adapters could lead to potential performance bottlenecks or introduce unnecessary complexity without offering significant benefits in their specific use cases.
Conclusion
The inclusion of std::initializer_list constructors in std::flat_set and std::flat_map is a deliberate design decision aimed at simplifying initialization while leveraging the advantages of their underlying array-based implementation. It enables a more efficient and intuitive way to populate these containers during creation, especially when order and direct access are crucial factors in your application.
